Betteridge's law is an adage that states "Any headline that ends in a question mark can be answered by the word no." The sweeping generalization refers to the poor journalistic practice of writing sensational headlines in the form of a question in order to compensate for the author's lack of facts. Much like Murphy's Law -- anything that can go wrong will, and at the worst time possible -- Betteridge's law is rooted in cynical humor. Phrasing headlines as a question is a legitimate practice that has become closely associated with fake news due to its misuse. When a headline is phrased as a question to which the answer is "no," the author is free to ask hypothetical questions designed to appeal to emotion. Examples of headlines that comply with Betteridge's law include: - Can Amazon Alexa be trusted?
- Should Google Home fear Watson Assistant?
- Will your next lawyer be named Siri?
Question-formatted headlines are often used for linkbaiting, the practice of crafting sensational content in hopes that readers and content providers will share the content with others. Question-formatted headlines are also used to spread disinformation because they allow an unscrupulous author to imply that a story about a subjective opinion is based on objective fact. Betteridge's law, which is named for technology journalist Ian Betteridge, has been a maxim of online journalism since the 1990s. The misuse of eye-catching questions in headlines to increase circulation, however, can be traced back to yellow journalism, scandal sheets and political tracts of centuries past. |
No comments:
Post a Comment